Wednesday, September 21, 2005

Window of media justice starting to slip away in wake hurricane Katrina and moving back to business as usual…

We have to do what we can to keep media focused on what our government is doing, the below is scary.
A.R.

THE MEDIA SHIFT
MediaChannel anticipated a media shift in the Katrina story and called on readers to sign a petition to press the press and move the media to "Keep the Light on Injustice." We were not naïve. Nikki Finke reports in the LA Weekly that that shift is underway:

They Shoot News Anchors, Don’t They?Media moguls, not looters, killed Katrina’s truth tellers

For the first 120 hours after Hurricane Katrina, TV journalists were let off their leashes by their mogul owners, the result of a rare conjoining of flawless timing (summer’s biggest vacation week) and foulest tragedy (America's worst natural disaster). All of a sudden, broadcasters narrated disturbing images of the poor, the minority, the aged, the sick and the dead, and discussed complex issues like poverty, race, class, infirmity and ecology that never make it on the air in this swift-boat/anti-gay-marriage/Michael Jackson media-sideshow era. So began a perfect storm of controversy.
Contrary to the scripture so often quoted in these areas of Louisiana and Mississippi, the TV newscasters knew the truth, but the truth did not set them free. Because once the crisis point had passed, most TV journalists went back to business-as-usual, their choke chains yanked by no-longer-inattentive parent-company bosses who, fearful of fallout from fingering Dubya for the FEMA fuckups, decided yet again to sacrifice community need for corporate greed. Too quickly, Katrina’s wake was spun into a web of deceit by the Bush administration, then disseminated by the Big Media boys? club. (Karl Rove spent the post-hurricane weekend conjuring up ways to shift blame.)
If big media look like they’re propping up W’s presidency, they are. Because doing so is good for corporate coffers in the form of government contracts, billion-dollar tax breaks, regulatory relaxations and security favors. At least that wily old codger Sumner Redstone, head of Viacom, parent company of CBS, has admitted what everyone already knows is true: that, while he personally may be a Democrat, “It happens that I vote for Viacom. Viacom is my life, and I do believe that a Republican administration is better for media companies than a Democratic one...
(Soon)…The black guys were gone, and the lying white guys were back, hogging all the TV airtime. So many congressional Republicans were lined up on air to denounce the “blame-Bush game? “ all the while decrying the Louisiana Democrats-in-charge ? that it could have been conga night at the Chevy Chase Country Club...
...the real test of pathos vs. profit is still before us: whether the TV newscasters will spend the fresh reservoir of trust earned with the public to not only rattle Bush’s cage but also battle their own bosses. If not, it won’t be long before TV truth telling will be muzzled permanently.

Tuesday, September 13, 2005

Mediachannel.org Article + Katrina's window of opportunity on Media Reform

I am writing in a rage and I hope this is somewhat comprehensible. If not please immediately skip to the Mediachannel's piece on Brian Williams New Orleans, Katrina + the Media below my bit.

This article "NBC's Williams: Journalists' Gloves Off” illustrates plainly what is going on in our media: It is a big wake up call to what our collective inattention is doing to our country and the world.

While we are in a semi conscious haze thinking about lost white women and should we teach intelligent design as well as evolution, real important things are going on and setting us up for various catastrophes. We could have more riveting and interesting news. I am sure that our talented media could produce compelling reports on what is going on with our government with regards to how it effects our lives. One story could start with the population of the United States: If we elect people that we want to have a beer with how will they run the government and staff their cabinet; Home land security? Department of the treasury? Corporation for Public Broadcasting? and all the rest. This is scary to the point of science fiction. I am sure a very interesting news bit could be worked up regarding this topic that would make for interesting reading, listening and viewing.

We need smart government.
In fact it is probably smart government or die, as we have been seeing from Iraq, now more clearly than ever we are seeing form the Katrina hurricane disaster. We need a government that is accountable. Without proper accountability the hiring of cronies; large campaign donors or somebody's old college roommate will go unchecked and we will not have people experienced for the positions that they fill. And we have suffered from this and we can still suffer more if we do not put a stop to it. This is to our peril, this gets personal, it is not a dry boring story. It is information that we desperately need. This is our welfare at stake. As the media has been pointing out the failing of our government while it is happening in Mississippi and Louisiana it is making for riveting news, they have our nation's attention. The challenge of the media will be to point out the short comings before the actual disaster. And the challenge for us will be to pay attention and act.

We need effective and reality based government.
Again hiring your best friends or those who are most loyal to you is to live in your own fantasy. A responsible leader should appoint capable people who can perform. Our nation has become an international embarrassment with the handling of Katrina. It is unimaginable to the international community that we could have let our own citizens beg for help for days with out rescuing them. It is unimaginable to international community that we would have such poor planning with for a foreseeable storm. And it is unimaginable to international community that we are not seriously considering the consequences of global warming.

Just close your eyes and think: what if we had a bad government and they were ruining all our international relationships? What if we had a government that initiated war with another country and mismanaged the war so badly that we left the country in ruins? We would need a strong and independent press to fully reflect this reality to make what is going on in the world and our nation accessible and clear so that people could act in an educated fashion. And as Brian Williams points out that is what we have been missing for the last four years.
A.R



from: Mediachannel.org NBC's Williams: Journalists' Gloves Off
Submitted by editor5 on September 12, 2005 - 1:50pm.
By David Bauder
Source: Free Press
NBC’s Brian Williams says the lasting legacy of Hurricane Katrina for journalists may be the end of an unusual four-year period of deference to people in power.
There were so many angry, even incredulous, questions put to Bush administration officials about the response to Katrina that the Salon Web site compiled a “Reporters Gone Wild” video clip. Tim Russert, Anderson Cooper, Ted Koppel and Shepard Smith were among the stars.
The mute button seemingly in place since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks has been turned off.
“By dint of the fact that our country was hit we’ve offered a preponderance of the benefit of the doubt over the past couple of years,” the “Nightly News” anchorman said. “Perhaps we’ve taken something off our fastball and perhaps this is the story that brings a healthy amount of cynicism back to a news media known for it.”
Williams spent much of the past two weeks in New Orleans, huddling in the Superdome with suffering residents and giving one of the first warnings on the “Today” show that the levees had been breached.
Hundreds of reporters, in all media, did heroic work on the Gulf Coast in the deadly storm’s aftermath. None arguably was as financially and symbolically important to his company as the job turned in by Williams.
It could solidify his spot as network news’ top anchor. He was NBC News’ point person at a time its rivals had none, since replacements haven’t been named for the late Peter Jennings at ABC News or Dan Rather at CBS.
“Nightly News” viewership the week after the storm jumped 2.5 million from the week before, its lead over second-place ABC increasing to 1.1 million from 300,000, according to Nielsen Media Research. A Williams-anchored “Dateline NBC” special about Katrina was the most-watched program all week.
When ABC and CBS settle on succession plans, they’ll be playing catch-up.
Williams increased the value of his stock by aggressively seizing an opportunity, said Jeff Alan, author of “Anchoring America: The Changing Face of Network News.”
“Brian handled this as professionally as any of the reporters down there and maybe more so,” Alan said. “Brian knew how much was at stake here. Brian took his anchor hat off and put his human being hat on in a lot of the broadcasts that I saw.”
Williams said he’s focused on a story that will preoccupy the country for many months and probably play a key role in deciding the nation’s next president.
“I have not seen an inch of my own coverage,” he said. “I have very little sense of it and I’m probably the last judge of my own work. I tried to call them as I saw them. And if I let my emotion or anger get the better of me, what some would have called a failing of a journalist I think should be taken the other way around on this story.”
Pointed criticism of the government response has been posted on his daily Web log, particularly on Labor Day when he wrote about food and water being dropped to survivors: “There was water, there was food, and there were choppers to drop both. Why no one was able to combine them in an air drop is a cruel and criminal mystery of this dark chapter in our recent history. The words `failure of imagination’ come to mind.”
His blog also reprinted in full a National Weather Service bulletin from the morning before the storm struck that gave a prescient road map to the destruction, including power outages and water shortages that “will make human suffering incredible by modern standards.”
Williams said he sensed trouble brewing already that Sunday, Aug. 28. At the Superdome, he saw National Guardsman barking orders at people seeking shelter, and patting down small children and the elderly for weapons. The crowd was angry about being forced to stand in line in the rain even though there was a large overhang a few yards away, he said.
“I went back to my hotel to get a few hours of sleep before they sealed the Dome at 6 the next morning thinking, `This is not good,’” he said.
He was one of a few reporters stationed at the dome as it degenerated into a house of horrors, and used his cell phone to snap a picture of its damaged roof that was widely circulated on NBC and MSNBC.
“I can’t shake the belief that I got to know people who aren’t with us anymore,” he said.
One imaginative piece was produced simply by using a camcorder at the Baton Rouge airport on Labor Day when Williams and a crew returned, illustrating how the airport itself was filled with hundreds of compelling human stories.
About the only blemish on Williams’ record was NBC’s failure to lead its Aug. 30 “Nightly News” with the levees breaking in New Orleans, said Andrew Tyndall, a consultant who studies news content. NBC says that criticism is unfair, since the levee breaches were one of several angles Williams touched upon at the opening of that newscast.
Williams has had a hellish travelogue the past year, including Banda Aceh after the tsunami and a battleground in Mosul, Iraq, filled with the dead and dying. He never thought he’d see such suffering in his own country.
“I measure my words very carefully,” he said. “I guard my opinions very carefully. To me, this was life and death.
“I refuse to believe that anyone I met at the dome has lesser value than anybody in my family that I go home to. I don’t believe that about this country. I don’t want that to be the lesson in this. I was angry. People were going without and dying in the wealthiest country the world has ever known.”

Sunday, September 04, 2005

C-SPAN networks in jeopardy

Current Status

MUST-CARRY DEBATE MOVES TO CONGRESS

Earlier this year in February the Federal Communications Commission decisively rejected the so-called "dual must-carry" proposal. This proposal would have required cable operators to give every local broadcaster a second channel on their systems during the perhaps years-long transition from analog broadcasting to digital broadcasting.

The FCC also rejected the "multi-cast, must-carry" proposal. If approved, this proposal would have forced cable operators to give broadcasters enough space on their systems to deliver several broadcast signals instead of just one.

C-SPAN had opposed both proposals because we believe the government should not give preferential treatment to broadcast stations over cable programmers as both seek access to the limited channel capacity of cable systems. Had the proposals become effective, the C-SPAN Networks would have had fewer opportunities to expand the availability of our public service programming to cable television subscribers.

However, the must-carry debate is not over. The debate has moved to the Congress where legislation to govern the upcoming transition from analog television to digital television is pending. There continue to be efforts on Capitol Hill to resuscitate variations of the must-carry rule and enact them into law.

C-SPAN remains opposed to any form of the must-carry rule, whether it applies to analog or digital television. The rule and its variations infringe on C-SPAN's First Amendment free speech rights, and, it is unfair. We will keep you informed of the progress of the must-carry debate in Congress on this page.

{more}
http://www.mustcarry.org/